21 October 2026 · Site Methodology & Corrections · 5 min read
I was updating our Groq pricing page and went to re-check the Llama 3.3 70B rate I'd verified back in August. It's gone. Groq's own model table now lists llama-3.3-70b-versatile as "Enterprise," with both the price and the rate limit columns reading "Contact Sales." I checked Cerebras next, since it's the other provider built entirely around fast open-model inference. Same story: Llama 3.3 70B is still technically supported, but only through Dedicated Inference -- the Enterprise tier, priced "Contact us for a quote." Neither company's self-serve, pay-as-you-go tier publishes a Llama 70B price anymore.
In September I wrote about Groq's Llama 70B pricing at 0,59 доллара США на входе / 0,79 доллара США на выходе за 1 миллион токенов. That number isn't wrong because I mis-measured it -- it's wrong because Groq removed it. Pulling the current GroqCloud model table, the only two text models with a public per-token price are GPT-OSS-120B and GPT-OSS-20B:
| Модель | Status on Groq (Oct 2026) | Цена |
|---|---|---|
| Лама 3.3 70Б | Предприятие | Contact Sales |
| Лама 3.1 8Б | Предприятие | Contact Sales |
| GPT-OSS 120B | Self-serve Developer tier | $0.15 / $0.60 per 1M |
| GPT-OSS 20B | Self-serve Developer tier | $0.075 / $0.30 per 1M |
Mixtral 8x7B, which used to round out Groq's self-serve lineup, isn't in the current model list at all -- featured, production or preview tiers. Cerebras tells the same story from the other side: its public Developer Tier pricing table lists exactly two models with a price -- GPT-OSS-120B at $0.35/$0.75 per 1M, and Qwen3.8-27B at $0.99/$1.49 per 1M. Llama 3.3 70B appears only in Cerebras's Dedicated Inference supported-models list, which is the "contact us for a quote" product.
It hasn't vanished from the market -- just from the two speed-focused providers. SambaNova and Together AI both still quote it in the open, at noticeably different rates:
| Поставщик | Llama 3.3 70B price | Уровень |
|---|---|---|
| SambaNova | $0.60 / $1.20 per 1M | Self-serve |
| Вместе ИИ | $1.04 / $1.04 per 1M | Self-serve (serverless) |
| Грок | Contact Sales | Enterprise only |
| Церебрас | Contact us for a quote | Dedicated / Enterprise only |
If Llama 3.3 70B specifically is what your app needs, SambaNova is the cheaper of the two public options by a wide margin -- about 42% less than Together on input, and close on output once you weigh a realistic 3:1 input-heavy workload.
Since GPT-OSS-120B is the one ~120B-class open model all four providers still publish a self-serve rate for, it's become the real apples-to-apples comparison -- not by my choice, but because it's the only one left standing on every price list:
| Поставщик | Ввод $/1 млн. | Выход $/1 млн. | Claimed speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Грок | $0.15 | $0.60 | ~500 tok/s |
| Вместе ИИ | $0.15 | $0.60 | not published alongside price |
| SambaNova | $0.22 | $0.59 | not published alongside price |
| Церебрас | $0.35 | $0.75 | ~3,000 tok/s |
Groq and Together land on an identical headline rate. SambaNova is close behind and actually cheaper on output. Cerebras is the most expensive of the four on paper -- but it's also the only one advertising a specific speed number on the same page, and 3,000 tokens/second is roughly 6x Groq's published 500. Whether that's worth the premium depends entirely on whether your workload is latency-bound or cost-bound; a voice agent racing to finish a sentence before the user notices a pause cares about the first number, a batch summarization job cares about the second.
I rewrote the Groq pricing page: the table now shows GPT-OSS-120B and GPT-OSS-20B as the self-serve models, with an explicit note that Llama moved to Enterprise/Contact Sales, and I swapped the quick-start curl example off llama-3.1-8b-instant since that model ID no longer works on a self-serve key. I didn't touch the September Llama 70B comparison post itself -- it was accurate when published -- but added a note pointing here, since its headline Groq number is the one that's since disappeared.
Same lesson as the DeepSeek Search/Fetch pricing piece last week: a provider's price list is a snapshot, not a contract, and the fast-inference market in particular is still rearranging what it charges for which model every few weeks.
New to usage-based API pricing in general? Start with the бесплатные руководства по стоимости API.
Разверните его самостоятельно: DigitalOcean — бесплатный кредит в размере 200 долларов США ↗ · Хостингер VPS ↗
Checked directly against Groq's console.groq.com/docs/models table, Cerebras's cerebras.ai/pricing and inference-docs.cerebras.ai dedicated-tier model list, SambaNova's cloud.sambanova.ai/pricing, and Together AI's together.ai/pricing, 2026-10-21. Reference figures, not live quotes -- confirm current terms directly with each provider before budgeting.