What was wrong with the LogRocket pricing on your comparison page?

The page listed LogRocket tiers called "Team" at roughly $99/mo for 10,000 sessions and "Professional" at roughly $295/mo. Neither tier name exists. LogRocket's real plans are Core and Pro, and Pro only becomes mandatory above 100,000 sessions/month. The actual price at LogRocket's default position -- 25,000 sessions, annual billing -- is $176/mo, found by reading the number off first page load, since the pricing slider is a React-controlled input that re-renders its price with a count-up animation that will not reliably fire after a scripted interaction. Above 25,000 sessions we now show "Quote / Contact sales" instead of inventing a number.

What was wrong with the Mapbox pricing?

Two numbers, both too low in one case and mixing up two different products in the other. Static/raster tiles were priced at $1 per 1,000 after the free tier; the real first paid tier is $0.50 per 1,000, so the old number was double the real cost. Geocoding was priced at $5 per 1,000, which is real -- but it's the rate for Mapbox's Permanent Geocoding API, a separate product with no free tier at all. The Temporary Geocoding API, the one almost every developer actually uses because it ships with a free tier, is $0.75 per 1,000. All four free-tier thresholds we had listed -- 50,000 map loads, 200,000 static tiles, 100,000 geocoding requests, 100,000 directions requests -- checked out correctly; only the paid per-unit rates were wrong.

What was wrong with the ElevenLabs pricing?

The dollar price on the entry paid tier was off by one dollar ($5 shown, $6 actual). The character allowances on the Creator and Pro tiers were both understated -- Creator was shown as roughly 100,000 characters when it is actually 121,000, and Pro was shown as roughly 500,000 when it is actually 600,000. More significant: the table stopped at Pro as if it were the top tier, when ElevenLabs actually has two tiers above it -- Scale at $299/mo for 1.8 million credits and three seats, and Business at $990/mo for 6 million credits and ten seats. Anyone scaling past Pro would have seen a dead end that doesn't exist.

How often should an API pricing comparison site re-check its own numbers?

Vendors change tier names, split one product into two billing lines, or add entirely new tiers above their old top tier without a changelog entry anywhere obvious -- none of the three errors here were announced price hikes, they were just pages that had quietly drifted out of date relative to a vendor's current page. The only reliable fix is treating every published price as a claim with an expiry date: re-read the vendor's live pricing page periodically and diff it against what you published, rather than trusting a number because it was correct when you first wrote it.

I Audited Our Own Pricing Pages Against the Vendors. Three Numbers Were Wrong.

18 October 2026 · Site Methodology & Corrections · 5 min read

This site's entire pitch is that our numbers are more trustworthy than a vendor's own marketing page. So this week I picked three pages at random and actually checked them against the vendor, line by line, instead of assuming they were still right. All three had something wrong. One had a tier name that doesn't exist. One mixed up two different products that happen to share a page. One was missing two entire pricing tiers above the one it showed as the top option.

LogRocket: a tier name we made up

Our session-replay comparison page listed LogRocket's tiers as "Team" at about $99/mo for 10,000 sessions and "Professional" at about $295/mo. Neither name is real. LogRocket's actual plans are Core and Pro -- Pro only becomes mandatory once you're above 100,000 sessions a month. Getting the real number out required dealing with a page that fights automated checks: the price updates through a React-controlled slider, and the rendered dollar figure runs a count-up animation that will not fire reliably after a scripted drag of that slider. Four different interaction methods all left the price blank. The one method that worked was reading the number off the page's default, un-interacted state: 25,000 sessions, annual billing, $176/mo. I fixed the table to show Core/Pro with that real anchor point, and anything above 25,000 sessions now reads "Quote / Contact sales" instead of a number I'd have to guess at.

Mapbox: a product mix-up, not just a stale number

Mapbox was wrong in two different ways. Static and raster map tiles were priced at $1 per 1,000 after the free tier; the real first paid rate is $0.50 per 1,000 -- our page would have told a developer their tile bill is double what it actually is. Geocoding was listed at $5 per 1,000, and that number is real, it's just the wrong product: it's Mapbox's Permanent Geocoding API, which has no free tier at all. The Temporary Geocoding API -- the one almost everyone actually integrates, because it ships with a free monthly allowance -- is $0.75 per 1,000. Whoever built the original page grabbed a true number off the wrong row of Mapbox's pricing page. Worth noting: all four free-tier thresholds we had listed (50,000 map loads, 200,000 static tiles, 100,000 geocoding requests, 100,000 directions requests) were already correct. Only the paid per-unit rates needed fixing, and I added the declining-tier rates (tile prices step down further at higher volume) to the disclaimer so the single headline number doesn't look like the whole story.

ElevenLabs: two tiers that just weren't there

Smaller dollar error here -- Starter showed $5, it's actually $6 -- but the character allowances were both understated: Creator showed roughly 100,000 characters against a real 121,000, and Pro showed roughly 500,000 against a real 600,000. The bigger problem was structural. Our table ended at Pro like it was the ceiling. It isn't. ElevenLabs has Scale above it at $299/mo for 1.8 million credits and three seats, and Business above that at $990/mo for 6 million credits and ten seats. Any team outgrowing Pro and checking our page would have seen a wall that doesn't exist in ElevenLabs' actual pricing.

Why this keeps happening

None of these three were announced price hikes I missed. They were just pages that drifted: a vendor renames tiers, splits one API into two billing lines (Mapbox), or quietly adds a tier above their previous top one (ElevenLabs), and none of it shows up as a changelog entry anywhere obvious. A price you published correctly six months ago is a claim with an expiry date, not a fact. The only thing that catches this reliably is going back and actually reading the vendor's current page against what we published, instead of trusting that a number is still right because it used to be.

What I'm doing about it

All three pages are fixed and dated. I'm not treating this as a one-time cleanup -- it's now a recurring pass: periodically pick pages, especially ones with sliders, tiered plans, or multiple product lines that can get confused for each other, and re-verify against the live vendor source rather than assuming the table is still accurate. If you spot a number on this site that looks off, that's the fastest way to find the next one -- tell us and we'll check it the same way.

Hotjar vs LogRocket vs Microsoft Clarity cost calculator — corrected LogRocket tiers and real session pricing.
Mapbox pricing guide — corrected tile and geocoding rates, with the right product line.
ElevenLabs pricing guide — full tier table including Scale and Business.

¿Es nuevo en los precios de API basados en el uso en general? Comience con el guías gratuitas de costos de API.

Despliéguelo usted mismo: DigitalOcean — $200 de crédito gratis ↗ · VPS Hostinger ↗

Checked directly against LogRocket, Mapbox and ElevenLabs' own live pricing pages, 2026-10-17/18. Reference figures, not live quotes -- confirm current terms directly with each provider before budgeting.