How LLM API Pricing Works

Tokens, input vs output, context windows — why the same task can cost 50× more on one model than another, explained simply.

Home › AI Models › Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Astra

Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Astra: price comparison

Real 2026 API prices side by side, with the total cost of a typical 10M-input / 3M-output monthly workload.

Price & cost at a glance

Grok 4.7GPT-6 Astra
Input / 1M tokens$2$10
Output / 1M tokens$6$50
Context window500K272K
Cost — 10M in + 3M out$38$250

Green = cheaper / larger. Prices per 1M tokens, USD. Snapshot 2026 — verify with the provider.

Which is cheaper?

Grok 4.7 is the cheaper option on a 10M-in / 3M-out workload — about $38/mo versus $250 for GPT-6 Astra (~6.6× difference). Because output tokens are billed higher, the model with the lower output price usually wins as your responses get longer.

Run your own token mix in the cost calculator, or see each model in depth: Grok 4.7 · GPT-6 Astra.

Frequently asked

Is Grok 4.7 or GPT-6 Astra cheaper?

At a typical 10M input + 3M output tokens per month, Grok 4.7 costs about $38 versus $250 for GPT-6 Astra — Grok 4.7 is roughly 6.6x cheaper on this workload. Your ratio of input to output tokens changes the gap.

What's the price difference between Grok 4.7 and GPT-6 Astra?

Grok 4.7 is $2/$6 per 1M input/output tokens; GPT-6 Astra is $10/$50. Output tokens usually dominate a bill, so compare the output price first.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.7 or GPT-6 Astra?

Grok 4.7 supports about 500K tokens and GPT-6 Astra about 272K. A bigger window costs more per call because every token in context is billed.

Educational estimates — not affiliated with any provider.