—トークン/月
—net value / month
—break-even reviewer time
Where the tokens go
| 成分 | Tokens / review | Cost / review | 月額料金 |
|---|
The same reviews on different model tiers
| 階層 | $ / 1M in · out | Cost / PR | 月額料金 |
|---|
Reference rates for broad 2026 tiers, not specific products — check current pricing on the モデル比較. A reasoning model also bills its hidden thinking tokens as output, so its real cost sits above the row shown here.
Tune the noise before you tune the model
At any realistic salary, a couple of minutes spent dismissing a bogus comment costs more than a hundred reviews' worth of tokens — which is why the lever that matters is comment quality, not model price. Narrow the review scope, raise the confidence threshold, and stop attaching context the model does not use. Price the underlying tokens on the LLM トークンコスト計算ツール, see what caching that fixed block is worth on the プロンプトキャッシュ節約計算ツール, compare paying per seat against calling the API yourself on the subscription vs API calculator, and put the whole assistant spend against hours saved on the AI coding ROI calculator.
LLM トークンコスト計算ツール即時キャッシュによる節約AI Coding ROIサブスクリプションと APIGitHub Actions Cost
この計算機の仕組み
の AI Code Review Cost Calculator builds one review from the bottom up. The diff is lines changed times tokens per line; the fixed context — system prompt, coding guidelines, pinned repository files — is added on top and split into a cached share billed at a fraction of the input rate and an uncached remainder billed in full. 出力トークン are the review comments themselves, priced at the output rate, which is typically four to five times the input rate and is usually the largest single line. Multiplying by passes per PR accounts for re-reviews after the author pushes changes, and multiplying by monthly pull requests gives the invoice.
The second half is the part most comparisons skip. Reviewer minutes saved valued at a loaded hourly rate is the benefit; false flags times the minutes spent dismissing each is a real cost paid in the same currency. Netting all three gives the monthly value, and dividing the API cost per PR by the reviewer's per-second rate gives the とんとん: the amount of human time the bot must save on each pull request to pay for itself, which is usually seconds. That asymmetry is the whole point — token price is almost never the deciding variable, comment precision is. Rates are reference estimates and change frequently; confirm current pricing with your provider.